Bunge vs. Esser - Eine Analyse von Kritik an der Rational-Choice-Theorie (German Edition)
13 Angebote vergleichen

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
Bunge-vs-Esser-Eine-Analyse-von-Kritik-an-der-Rational-Choice-Theorie~~Lukas-Oldenburg, Bunge vs. Esser - Eine Analyse von Kritik an der Rational-Choice-Theorie: Eine Analyse von Kritik an der Rational-Choice-Theorie, NOOK Book (eBook).

Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
Paperback. 56 pages. Dimensions: 8.1in. x 5.8in. x 0.2in.Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1, 0, Europa-Universitt Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalittstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Anmerkungen: Vorstellung des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes von Hartmut Esser, Analyse von Kritik Bunges an Rational-Choice-Theorien generell, Vergleich von Kritik und tatschlicher Theorie. , Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of rational choice consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i. e. ESSERs) and BUNGEs criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGEs reproaches do apply and where they dont. It will be shown that BUNGE doesnt take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science. This item ships from multiple locations. Your book may arrive from Roseburg,OR, La Vergne,TN.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Anmerkungen: Vorstellung des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes von Hartmut Esser, Analyse von Kritik Bunges an Rational-Choice-Theorien generell, Vergleich von Kritik und tatsächlicher Theorie. , Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of "rational choice" consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i.e. ESSER's) and BUNGE's criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGE's reproaches do apply and where they don't. It will be shown that BUNGE doesn't take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science.2007. 28 S. 210 mmVersandfertig in 3-5 Tagen, Softcover.

Lieferung aus: Österreich, Bestellungen ab EUR 20,- Einkaufswert sind innerhalb Österreichs versandkostenfrei. Bei Bestellungen unter EUR 20,- Warenwert berechnen wir EUR 3,- Versandkosten. Bestellungen von Bonuscard-Kunden mit mindestens einem Buch (ausgenommen eBooks), sind innerhalb Österreichs versandkostenfrei! Die voraussichtliche Versanddauer liegt bei 1 bis 6 Werktagen. Versandfertig in 4 - 6 Tagen.
Bunge vs. Esser - Eine Analyse von Kritik an der Rational-Choice-Theorie, Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Anmerkungen: Vorstellung des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes von Hartmut Esser, Analyse von Kritik Bunges an Rational-Choice-Theorien generell, Vergleich von Kritik und tatsächlicher Theorie. , Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of "rational choice" consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i.e. ESSER's) and BUNGE's criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGE's reproaches do apply and where they don't. It will be shown that BUNGE doesn't take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Bunge vs. Esser - Eine Analyse von Kritik an der Rational-Choice-Theorie: Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalit?tstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of `rational choice` consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i.e. ESSER`s) and BUNGE`s criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGE`s reproaches do apply and where they don`t. It will be shown that BUNGE doesn`t take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science. Ebook.

Bunge vs. Esser - Eine Analyse von Kritik an der Rational-Choice-Theorie ab 12.99 EURO 1. Auflage.

Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing ... Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of rational choice consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i.e. ESSERs) and BUNGEs criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGEs reproaches do apply and where they dont. It will be shown that BUNGE doesnt take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science. 24.01.2006, ePUB.

Lieferung aus: Schweiz, Sofort per Download lieferbar.
Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing ... Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of rational choice consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i.e. ESSERs) and BUNGEs criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGEs reproaches do apply and where they dont. It will be shown that BUNGE doesnt take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science. ePUB, 24.01.2006.

Von Händler/Antiquariat, ABC Books [9235530], Lowfield Heath, CRAWL, United Kingdom.
Paperback. Hauptseminararbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), einseitig bedruckt, Note: 1,0, Europa-Unive.Shipping may be from our UK, US or Australian warehouse depending on stock availability. This item is printed on demand. 56 pages. 0.086.

Lieferung aus: Schweiz, zzgl. Versandkosten, Sofort per Download lieferbar.
Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Theoretische (Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Logik, Sprache), Note: 1,0, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Veranstaltung: Rationalitätstheorien, 18 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, For many years now, MARIO BUNGE has adamantly been criticizing rational choice theory for various reasons. While HARTMUT ESSER, a strong advocate of the theory, stresses its applica-bility and usefulness in any form of social science as well as its basic simplicity, BUNGE and other opponents of rational choice consider it to be empty, inapplicable and even pseudoscientific, mainly because of its excessive generality. The objective of this paper is to take a closer look at both an enhanced and modern version of a rational choice model (i.e. ESSERs) and BUNGEs criticism of rational choice theory in general. This way, we will be able to judge where BUNGEs reproaches do apply and where they dont. It will be shown that BUNGE doesnt take into account essential parts of the theory whereas in many points his criti-cism is indeed justifiable. This examination will concretize the viewpoint for a short conclud-ing look at whether and how rational choice theory can be useful for science.