Is Microsoft's Monopoly Position in the Public Interest? Author
8 Angebote vergleichen
Preise | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schnitt | € 2,99 | € 2,99 | € 3,30 | € 3,17 |
Nachfrage |
1
Is Microsoft's Monopoly Position in the Public Interest?
DE NW
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, in Deutsch, GRIN Verlag GmbH, neu.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, sofort lieferbar.
2012, 5 Seiten, Englisch, [...] In the 1980s Microsoft required its OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) to pay a per processor license fee for the computers that they shipped and this discouraged those OEMs such as HP and Dell to install any other operating systems. In 1994 an antitrust suit was filed against Microsoft as the arrangement method that they followed seemed to be anticompetitive. Although Microsoft agreed to not use the per processor license fee, they had already gained a large advantage over their competitors. In the 1990s as IBM was an OEM and also made operating systems and other application softwares they were considered by Microsoft to be a competitor and a possible threat. Thus Microsoft, in a discriminatory fashion, charged IBM higher license prices for its operating systems and withheld technical support from them. IBM later filed a suit against Microsoft and they settled the claim, but Microsoft had again, already gained the upper hand [...].
2012, 5 Seiten, Englisch, [...] In the 1980s Microsoft required its OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) to pay a per processor license fee for the computers that they shipped and this discouraged those OEMs such as HP and Dell to install any other operating systems. In 1994 an antitrust suit was filed against Microsoft as the arrangement method that they followed seemed to be anticompetitive. Although Microsoft agreed to not use the per processor license fee, they had already gained a large advantage over their competitors. In the 1990s as IBM was an OEM and also made operating systems and other application softwares they were considered by Microsoft to be a competitor and a possible threat. Thus Microsoft, in a discriminatory fashion, charged IBM higher license prices for its operating systems and withheld technical support from them. IBM later filed a suit against Microsoft and they settled the claim, but Microsoft had again, already gained the upper hand [...].
2
Is Microsoft's Monopoly Position in the Public Interest? Amir Colombus Author (2012)
~EN NW EB DL
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, vermutlich in Englisch, GRIN Verlag GmbH, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Economy - Theory of Competition, Competition Policy, grade: B, University of Manchester, language: English, abstract: [...] In the 1980's Microsoft required its OEM's (original equipment manufacturers) to pay a 'per processor license fee' for the computers that they shipped and this discouraged those OEM's such as HP and Dell to install any other operating systems. In 1994 an antitrust suit was filed against Microsoft as the arrangement method that they followed seemed to be anticompetitive. Although Microsoft agreed to not use the 'per processor license fee', they had already gained a large advantage over their competitors. In the 1990's as IBM was an OEM and also made operating systems and other application software's they were considered by Microsoft to be a competitor and a possible threat. Thus Microsoft, in a discriminatory fashion, charged IBM higher license prices for its operating systems and withheld technical support from them. IBM later filed a suit against Microsoft and they settled the claim, but Microsoft had again, already gained the upper hand [...].
Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Economy - Theory of Competition, Competition Policy, grade: B, University of Manchester, language: English, abstract: [...] In the 1980's Microsoft required its OEM's (original equipment manufacturers) to pay a 'per processor license fee' for the computers that they shipped and this discouraged those OEM's such as HP and Dell to install any other operating systems. In 1994 an antitrust suit was filed against Microsoft as the arrangement method that they followed seemed to be anticompetitive. Although Microsoft agreed to not use the 'per processor license fee', they had already gained a large advantage over their competitors. In the 1990's as IBM was an OEM and also made operating systems and other application software's they were considered by Microsoft to be a competitor and a possible threat. Thus Microsoft, in a discriminatory fashion, charged IBM higher license prices for its operating systems and withheld technical support from them. IBM later filed a suit against Microsoft and they settled the claim, but Microsoft had again, already gained the upper hand [...].
3
Is Microsofts Monopoly Position in the Public Interest?
DE NW EB DL
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, in Deutsch, GRIN Verlag, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, E-Book zum Download.
[...] In the 1980s Microsoft required its OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) to pay a per processor license fee for the computers that they shipped and this discouraged those OEMs such as HP and Dell to install any other operating systems. In 1994 an antitrust suit was filed against Microsoft as the arrangement method that they followed seemed to be anticompetitive. Although Microsoft agreed to not use the per processor license fee, they had already gained a large advantage over their competitors. In the 1990s as IBM was an OEM and also made operating systems and other application softwares they were considered by Microsoft to be a competitor and a possible threat. Thus Microsoft, in a discriminatory fashion, charged IBM higher license prices for its operating systems and withheld technical support from them. IBM later filed a suit against Microsoft and they settled the claim, but Microsoft had again, already gained the upper hand [...].
[...] In the 1980s Microsoft required its OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) to pay a per processor license fee for the computers that they shipped and this discouraged those OEMs such as HP and Dell to install any other operating systems. In 1994 an antitrust suit was filed against Microsoft as the arrangement method that they followed seemed to be anticompetitive. Although Microsoft agreed to not use the per processor license fee, they had already gained a large advantage over their competitors. In the 1990s as IBM was an OEM and also made operating systems and other application softwares they were considered by Microsoft to be a competitor and a possible threat. Thus Microsoft, in a discriminatory fashion, charged IBM higher license prices for its operating systems and withheld technical support from them. IBM later filed a suit against Microsoft and they settled the claim, but Microsoft had again, already gained the upper hand [...].
4
Is Microsoft`s Monopoly Position in the Public Interest? (2012)
DE NW EB DL
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, in Deutsch, GRIN Verlag, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
5
Is Microsoft's Monopoly Position in the Public Interest? (2012)
DE NW EB DL
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, in Deutsch, GRIN Verlag, GRIN Verlag, GRIN Verlag, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Frankreich, in-stock.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
6
Is Microsoft's Monopoly Position in the Public Interest?
DE NW EB
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, in Deutsch, GRIN Verlag GmbH, neu, E-Book.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
7
Is Microsoft's Monopoly Position in the Public Interest?
DE NW EB DL
ISBN: 9783656103608 bzw. 3656103607, in Deutsch, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, zzgl. Versandkosten, Free Shipping on eligible orders over $25.
Amir Colombus, NOOK Book (eBook), Edition: 1, English-language edition,.
Amir Colombus, NOOK Book (eBook), Edition: 1, English-language edition,.
Lade…