The Heuristics Debate - 6 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 10,28 (vom 10.10.2016)1
The Heuristics Debate (2011)
EN HC NWISBN: 9780199755608 bzw. 0199755604, in Englisch, Oxford University Press Inc, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, 4-8 werkdagen.
Von Privat, Books2Anywhere.
All of use heuristics-that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without utilizing or analyzing all of the available information at hand. For instance, when we tell someone we walked 'a mile,' we might not know if we actually walked that distance precisely, but we know that if we tell someone that distance, the listener will have a good sense of the distance from point A to point B. Heuristics pervade all aspects of life, from the most mundane practices to more important ones like econom... All of use heuristics-that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without utilizing or analyzing all of the available information at hand. For instance, when we tell someone we walked 'a mile,' we might not know if we actually walked that distance precisely, but we know that if we tell someone that distance, the listener will have a good sense of the distance from point A to point B. Heuristics pervade all aspects of life, from the most mundane practices to more important ones like economic decision making and politics. The study of heuristics originated in psychology, but in recent years, behavioral economists like Daniel Kahneman have studied how heuristics shape our economic decisions. Not surprisingly, opinions vary about our tendency to use heuristics. The 'heuristics and biases' school argues that the practice often leads to outcomes that are not ideal: people act on too little information, make incorrect assumptions, and don't understand the consequences of their actions. The 'fast and frugal' school contends that while mistakes will inevitably occur, the benefits-prompt action that leads to real achievements, as opposed to paralysis-by-analysis-generally outweigh the costs. In The Heuristics Debate, Mark Kelman takes a step back from the chaos of competing academic debates to consider the wealth of knowledge that a more expansive use of heuristics can open up. Removing the concept from the realm of economic cost-benefit analysis and into the practical, relevant domains of public and private life, Kelman uncovers a powerful tool for understanding the relationship between human reasoning ad public policy. Can we figure out more optimal modes of disclosure to consumers, or better rules of evidence and jury instructions if we understand more accurately how people process information? Can we figure out how best to increase compliance with law if we understand how people make decisions whether or not to comply? Will democratically responsive bodies regulate risk better if we understand how the public overestimates and underestimates potential risks? Alongside a penetrating analysis of the various schools of thought on heuristics, Kelman ultimately offers a comprehensive account of how heuristics shapes-and misshapes-law and policy in America. The Heuristics Debate is a groundbreaking work that will reshape how we think about the relationship between human psychology, the law, and public policy. The book will appeal to advanced students and scholars of law, business and public policy, both for its insight into decision-making as well as its overall relevance to each of these fields. It will also be of interest to undergraduate psychology students, particularly those looking at the relationship between psychology and public policy.Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 26x236x163 mm;Gewicht: 578,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: mei 2011;ISBN10: 0199755604;ISBN13: 9780199755608; Engelstalig | Hardcover | 2011.
Von Privat, Books2Anywhere.
All of use heuristics-that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without utilizing or analyzing all of the available information at hand. For instance, when we tell someone we walked 'a mile,' we might not know if we actually walked that distance precisely, but we know that if we tell someone that distance, the listener will have a good sense of the distance from point A to point B. Heuristics pervade all aspects of life, from the most mundane practices to more important ones like econom... All of use heuristics-that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without utilizing or analyzing all of the available information at hand. For instance, when we tell someone we walked 'a mile,' we might not know if we actually walked that distance precisely, but we know that if we tell someone that distance, the listener will have a good sense of the distance from point A to point B. Heuristics pervade all aspects of life, from the most mundane practices to more important ones like economic decision making and politics. The study of heuristics originated in psychology, but in recent years, behavioral economists like Daniel Kahneman have studied how heuristics shape our economic decisions. Not surprisingly, opinions vary about our tendency to use heuristics. The 'heuristics and biases' school argues that the practice often leads to outcomes that are not ideal: people act on too little information, make incorrect assumptions, and don't understand the consequences of their actions. The 'fast and frugal' school contends that while mistakes will inevitably occur, the benefits-prompt action that leads to real achievements, as opposed to paralysis-by-analysis-generally outweigh the costs. In The Heuristics Debate, Mark Kelman takes a step back from the chaos of competing academic debates to consider the wealth of knowledge that a more expansive use of heuristics can open up. Removing the concept from the realm of economic cost-benefit analysis and into the practical, relevant domains of public and private life, Kelman uncovers a powerful tool for understanding the relationship between human reasoning ad public policy. Can we figure out more optimal modes of disclosure to consumers, or better rules of evidence and jury instructions if we understand more accurately how people process information? Can we figure out how best to increase compliance with law if we understand how people make decisions whether or not to comply? Will democratically responsive bodies regulate risk better if we understand how the public overestimates and underestimates potential risks? Alongside a penetrating analysis of the various schools of thought on heuristics, Kelman ultimately offers a comprehensive account of how heuristics shapes-and misshapes-law and policy in America. The Heuristics Debate is a groundbreaking work that will reshape how we think about the relationship between human psychology, the law, and public policy. The book will appeal to advanced students and scholars of law, business and public policy, both for its insight into decision-making as well as its overall relevance to each of these fields. It will also be of interest to undergraduate psychology students, particularly those looking at the relationship between psychology and public policy.Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 26x236x163 mm;Gewicht: 578,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: mei 2011;ISBN10: 0199755604;ISBN13: 9780199755608; Engelstalig | Hardcover | 2011.
2
The Heuristics Debate (2011)
EN HCISBN: 9780199755608 bzw. 0199755604, in Englisch, Oxford University Press, gebundenes Buch.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Book Deals [60506629], Lewiston, NY, U.S.A.
This Book is in Good Condition. Clean Copy With Light Amount of Wear. 100% Guaranteed. Summary: Mark Kelman's The Heuristics Debate shows how we can apply heuristics to other areas of public life beyond economicsLin particular, law and policymaking.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Book Deals [60506629], Lewiston, NY, U.S.A.
This Book is in Good Condition. Clean Copy With Light Amount of Wear. 100% Guaranteed. Summary: Mark Kelman's The Heuristics Debate shows how we can apply heuristics to other areas of public life beyond economicsLin particular, law and policymaking.
3
The Heuristics Debate
~EN NWISBN: 9780199755608 bzw. 0199755604, vermutlich in Englisch, Oxford University Press, Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, neu.
Lieferung aus: Kanada, Lagernd, zzgl. Versandkosten.
All of us use heuristics - that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without using or analyzing all of the available information. Heuristics pervade all aspects of life, from the most mundane practices to more important ones, like economic decision making and politics. People maydecide how fast to drive merely by mimicking others around them or decide in which safety project to invest public resources based on the past disasters most readily called to mind. Not surprisingly, opinions vary about our tendency to use heuristics. The "heuristics and biases" school argues thatthe practice often leads to outcomes that are not ideal: people act on too little information, make incorrect assumptions, and don''t understand the consequences of their actions. The "fast and frugal" school contends that while mistakes will inevitably occur, the benefits generally outweigh thecosts - not only because using heuristics enables us to reach judgments given realistic constraints of time and attention, but because heuristics users often outperform those using more conventionally rational methods.In The Heuristics Debate, Mark Kelman takes a step back from the chaos of competing academic debates to consider what we have learned - and still need to learn - about the way people actually make decisions. In doing so, Kelman uncovers a powerful tool for understanding the relationship betweenhuman reasoning and public policy. Can we figure out more optimal modes of disclosure to consumers or better rules of evidence and jury instructions if we understand more accurately how people process information? Can we figure out how best to increase compliance with law if we understand how peoplemake decisions about whether or not to comply? Alongside a penetrating analysis of the various schools of thought on heuristics, Kelman offers a comprehensive account of how distinct conceptions of the role and nature of heuristic reasoning shape - and misshape - law and policy in America. TheHeuristics Debate is a groundbreaking work that will change how we think about the relationship between human psychology, the law, and public policy.
All of us use heuristics - that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without using or analyzing all of the available information. Heuristics pervade all aspects of life, from the most mundane practices to more important ones, like economic decision making and politics. People maydecide how fast to drive merely by mimicking others around them or decide in which safety project to invest public resources based on the past disasters most readily called to mind. Not surprisingly, opinions vary about our tendency to use heuristics. The "heuristics and biases" school argues thatthe practice often leads to outcomes that are not ideal: people act on too little information, make incorrect assumptions, and don''t understand the consequences of their actions. The "fast and frugal" school contends that while mistakes will inevitably occur, the benefits generally outweigh thecosts - not only because using heuristics enables us to reach judgments given realistic constraints of time and attention, but because heuristics users often outperform those using more conventionally rational methods.In The Heuristics Debate, Mark Kelman takes a step back from the chaos of competing academic debates to consider what we have learned - and still need to learn - about the way people actually make decisions. In doing so, Kelman uncovers a powerful tool for understanding the relationship betweenhuman reasoning and public policy. Can we figure out more optimal modes of disclosure to consumers or better rules of evidence and jury instructions if we understand more accurately how people process information? Can we figure out how best to increase compliance with law if we understand how peoplemake decisions about whether or not to comply? Alongside a penetrating analysis of the various schools of thought on heuristics, Kelman offers a comprehensive account of how distinct conceptions of the role and nature of heuristic reasoning shape - and misshape - law and policy in America. TheHeuristics Debate is a groundbreaking work that will change how we think about the relationship between human psychology, the law, and public policy.
4
The Heuristics Debate (2011)
EN HC USISBN: 9780199755608 bzw. 0199755604, in Englisch, Oxford University Press, USA, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht, mit Einband.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Michener & Rutledge Booksellers, Inc. [52596500], Baldwin City, KS, U.S.A.
Text clean and tight; 1.1 x 9.1 x 6.4 Inches; 336 pages.
Text clean and tight; 1.1 x 9.1 x 6.4 Inches; 336 pages.
Lade…